By: Dawn
Smit
Now that you've entered the Zebulon contest sponsored by the Pikes Peak Writers, uploaded your story and paid your fee, what happens? It's almost time to announce the finalists. We thought you'd like to follow your entry through the months as the Zebulon progressed with a little backstory.
Round One:
Query letter judging
At the same time the contest was open for submissions, we also sent out a call for judges. Many of our judges have judged for this contest before (and many were judges when it was the “Paul Gillette” writing contest), but we’re always looking for new talent. Those judges have since registered for this year and told us how many submissions they’re willing to judge in each round.
When the
contest was still a hard copy-submitted enterprise, this would be the time when
the box window in my kitchen would fill with box upon box of entries each in
their own Manilla envelope. Knowing the number of submissions, I would check to
see if we had enough judges in each category, make some calls to fill gaps, and
then call in a boatload of volunteers to package everything up and mail out the
first round. Now, with the online contest created by our very own PPW
president, JT Evans, we no longer have to “touch” each
entry multiple times, but we still have to make sure we have the right
judge-entry balance before divvying up submissions.
Once that’s
done, the computer randomly selects the judges, humans do a double check, and
the judges receive an email that their query letters are available to read.
They judge your letter according to these guidelines: guidelines This
is where your entry goes in Round One.
Every letter is scored by two judges, and those scores are averaged. If that average score is at least 80% of the total possible score, your entry will move on to Round Two, which will begin in mid-December.
Round Two:
Manuscript and synopsis judging
Thanksgiving
has come and gone, and the Christmas season has begun. It must be time to judge
contest entries! Yes, along with holiday shopping, Christmas parties, and
family get-togethers, the Zebulon judges are taking the time to read
submissions. If your entry made it through Round One (and most have; we do our
best to give you all of the information you need to succeed), it is currently
in the queues of two judges. Fortunately, we at the Zebulon are not entirely
heartless, and so we give our judges through early January so that, if
necessary, they can recover from the holidays before plunging into the business
of reading, scoring and critiquing.
Round
Three: Third judge, anyone?
Once the
judges submit their scores, any entry that has a difference between the two
scores of 35 points or more will go to a third judge, which takes us into
February. Once the third judge submits a score, we’ll average the two closest
scores together for that entry’s final score.
To advance
to the final round, an entry must have two things: 1) a final score of at least
80% of the total possible score and 2) a score that ranks within the top three
for its category. If your entry qualifies, it’s off to the VIP judges.
Round Four:
VIP judging
It's now
February, and up to three high scoring entries for each category are winging
their way to the editors and agents who have agreed to read and rank the
entries for the final round of the Zebulon. Depending on their busy
schedules, our VIP judges may have this done in a matter of days or weeks. Once
we know, it's time to let our winners know.
And that’s
a wrap (up)
Finally
it’s time to return the entries. Though it’s possible everything has gone
smoothly, we plan for sickness and busy-ness and the unexpected, and so we
schedule the final return for early March. That gives people time to register
for the conference (if they
haven’t already) while it’s still at its lowest price of $395 through March 15.
So there you have it, a month for
preparation and query letter judging, a little over two months for judging the
synopsis and manuscript portions, and another month for VIP judging and the
return of submissions.
About the Author: Dawn Smit is a freelance editor and proofreader and the creator of Rainbow Editing®, a technique that writers can use to teach their computers to help them self edit. She was the contest director for the Paul Gillette Writing Contest from 2005 to 2010 and has returned for an encore.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.